Straight answers, including the awkward ones.

No. BioEquify is a measurement layer. We do not issue, sell or broker carbon units, and nothing on this site is an offer.

No. The method is designed to align with the EU CRCF, but no certification exists for it yet, and the CRCF is not yet part of the EEA Agreement.

A fixed fee per portfolio, quoted on request and agreed before we start. It never depends on what the forest shows. There is no long-term contract, and you keep the PDF.

Because the portfolio is too small for the change to exceed the measurement error. Below the minimum stand count, the report says so instead of guessing.

Per-stand laser estimates are noisy, so we report portfolios. Forest owners get a signed report through their cooperative.

Norway and Finland have live data paths in the workbench, Sweden is in build, and Denmark and Iceland are research conversations.

The national datasets belong to their publishers and are used under open licences. Stand boundaries you upload stay yours and are used only for your report.

No. NIBIO, Metsäkeskus, Skogsstyrelsen and the other publishers do not endorse BioEquify. We use their open data with attribution.

An automated check that every number on the site and in every report resolves to a registered claim with a source and a recheck date. Unknown or expired numbers block release.

Not automatically. On mineral soils the evidence does not support an easy claim, so we do not make one.

Yes. The founder can share a read-only link that expires, and sees when it is opened.